Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Voters tell Washington "Stop the war"

Today is a day of great rejoice for Americans-- not specifically because Democrats took control of both the U. S. Senate and House of Representatives-- they still have to prove themselves-- but because their electoral victory led to the immediate resignation of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. I'm going to interpret his departure as an indication that White House insiders believed the Democrats were about to channel their newfound power toward his ouster, even though I'm not completely convinced myself that they would have been adequately aggressive in that regard if given the chance.

I won't jump for joy yet in regards to potential legislative action. Let us not forget that it was a Democratic-controlled Senate, after the Republican defection of Jim Jeffords in 2001, that passed Bush's No Child Left Behind education bill, as well as the Patriot Act. It's particularly frightening that many Democrats are spinning their victory on Tuesday as a mandate to move the party to the center, when in fact the results had everything to do with the disastrous war in Iraq, now opposed by more than 60 percent of Americans. I shuddered when I heard one left-centrist pundit today describe Rumsfelds' resignation as an opportunity to "get the job done right" in Iraq, rather than to pursue the sound course of action and abandon the occupation altogether.

The first thing House Democrats need to do is follow Arianna Huffington's advice and anoint Jack Murtha their Majority Leader. He was the man most responsible for leading them to victory-- the elected representative who best demonstrated that the anti-war position was the centrist position across the nation. After his appointment, both chamber leaderships should push resolutions declaring that the U.S. military leave Iraq by July 1st of next year. The Iraqi people want that action, a majority of Americans want it, and the rest of the world now expects it after the public rebuke of Bush.

Much will be made of Ned Lamont's defeat at the hands of Joe Lieberman in Connecticut, but Lamont compromised his own campaign by stopping the drumbeat against the war immediately following his primary victory. He tried to carve out his own place in the center to combat "GOP Joe." Everywhere else, voters demanded a leftward push. I found particular redemption in the rejection of "Democrat" Harold Ford, Jr. in Kentucky, who ran as a full-bore Republican-- pro-gun, anti-gay, with public lectures in support of the Ten Commandments for good measure. He made Lieberman look like Eugene Debs in the Congress with a National Journal "liberal" rating of only 58 percent. Meanwhile, real liberals like Ohio Rep. Sherrod Brown (84% "liberal" on that same chart) and Vermont Rep. Bernie Sanders (90% "liberal") won their Senate races handedly on Tuesday. Even moderate Republicans like Iowa's own Jim Leach paid a price for standing too close to Bush. He lost to Democrat Dave Loebsack.

It's put up or shut up time now for Democrats. It was one thing to stand on the sidelines and watch the Republicans destroy themselves, it's something else altogether to truly lead. America has spoken. Bring our brave men and women home.

6 Comments:

At 8:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abandoning Iraq is just about the worst thing we could do now. As soon as we left, a full-fledged civil war would break out (we're having a hard time stopping that while we are there). You think the world hates us now, wait until we decide to pick up and call it quits in Iraq.

"Well, the war didn't work as we had planned. Sorry about your screwed up country and your lack of a reliable government, but I'm sure you will figure something out. See-ya."

Now, I'm not about to say we have done a good job in Iraq and I'm sure we should take the blame for some of the problems they are facing. But leaving now is not an option. I certainly don't have the answer to what is, but we got Iraq into this situation and we need to stay until they can get to some sort of peaceful (no civil war) resolution.

 
At 8:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"You think the world hates us now, wait until we decide to pick up and call it quits in Iraq."

No other country likes us regardless of Iraq. They never have, they never will.

 
At 8:59 PM, Blogger CM said...

The world once loved America, at least in an envious way. The best way I ever heard it described was by Dennis Miller. He said the rest of the world views America the way the rest of America views New York City. Of course, like all celebrity and hero worship, first we admire and envy, then eventually, we come to resent.

As for things getting worse in Iraq, we have a "full-fledged civil war" there already. There have been 150,000 Iraqis killed by insurgents since the war started. I would hate to think how much worse it could possibly get.

 
At 9:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you want the Dems to do or not do other than leave Iraq by July 1, 2007?

I hear a lot of talk of them raising the minimum wage. However, unless they index it to inflation they are just throwing the base a bone and enabling themselves to use this issue again and again to manipulate voters.

I like your points about the Patriot Act and No Child. Both parties are working for the same transnational corporations. Therefore, I suspect that the trends of the last 12 years will continue, i.e. bigger government, less personal freedom, open borders, and free trade.

I prefer the Constitution Party, but did you see that the Green Party candidate for IL governor received 10% of the vote? TA

 
At 9:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Remember, we started killing people because they taxed our tea."
Dennis Miller

 
At 12:38 AM, Blogger CM said...

I'm at a loss. I don't look upon the current minimum wage as a political football, I see it as an obscenity.

The Green candidate for governor in Iowa got 100 percent of my vote.

The Constitution Party, isn't that for "black helicopter" theorists?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home